On 4th November, Eurospeak Ireland hosted a lively debate on the pros and cons of online shopping at CPC Kilcullen. The event brought together 21 enthusiastic students, with 11 from the college’s debating club and 10 representatives from the Green Schools Committee. The Eurospeak team served as moderators, guiding the participants and ensuring a fair exchange of ideas.

The debate was conducted in a spontaneous format, with students receiving the topic and their assigned position only 30 minutes before the debate began. This approach added a level of challenge, requiring participants to draw on their existing knowledge, quickly structure their arguments, and think critically on the spot.

The debate was divided into two teams: one in favour of online shopping and one opposing it. Notably, some members of the proponent team mentioned that it was challenging to argue in favour of online shopping, as their personal beliefs aligned more closely with the opposition’s stance on the environmental and social drawbacks of e-commerce.

The proponent team highlighted the convenience and accessibility of online shopping, especially for those in rural areas or with limited mobility. They argued that online shopping offers a wide selection and 24/7 availability, making it easier for consumers to access goods and services. The team referenced data on the growth of online shopping, suggesting that reduced car travel to physical stores could potentially have environmental benefits.

The opposition team raised serious concerns about the environmental footprint of e-commerce, specifically citing companies like Temu as significant contributors to carbon emissions. They pointed out that online shopping often leads to increased packaging waste and emissions from delivery vehicles, particularly with the rise of fast fashion and single-use products. The opposition also discussed the negative impact on local economies, highlighting the importance of supporting small, community-based shops that struggle to compete with large online retailers.

Both teams made effective use of relevant data and research to strengthen their arguments. The judges commended the participants on their impressive ability to present clear and structured arguments with minimal preparation. They suggested that both teams could improve by engaging more directly with opposing points and focusing on conciseness for added impact.

In conclusion, the debate provided an invaluable experience for the students, helping them to develop public speaking skills, enhance their critical thinking, and gain a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding online shopping. By organising events like this, Eurospeak is helping students gain confidence, think on their feet, and engage thoughtfully with pressing current issues.